By Vuong Kha Tu
Aquaculture in Vietnam’s Mekong Delta is a crucial pillar of global seafood production, driven by a favorable climate and increasing regional economic demand. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) serves as an effective tool for evaluating the environmental impacts of this industry, thereby supporting researchers and policymakers in fostering sustainable development. This review synthesizes recent studies on the aquaculture systems of the Mekong Delta, studies which examined the role of LCA, the prevailing production methods in the region, and the key cultured species. The article also assesses the strengths and challenges of the LCA methodology and proposes future directions for sustainable aquaculture.
Aquaculture in Vietnam: Background Information
Aquaculture has long been a cornerstone of Southeast Asia’s economy and food security, with the region contributing nearly 90% of global production in recent years (FAO 2020). Vietnam, in particular, has emerged as a pivotal aquaculture hub, with the Mekong Delta accounting for over half of the country’s total aquatic output. This region supports the livelihoods of millions and generates significant export revenue, especially through the sale of shrimp and pangasius products, two species which are highly sought after on international markets. However, the rapid expansion of the aquaculture industry has raised concerns about environmental degradation, such as water pollution and habitat loss, leading to calls for sustainable practices.
Aquaculture in Vietnam: Present Status
The aquaculture species cultured in the Mekong Delta reflect both ecological adaptability and economic value. Whiteleg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) thrive in brackish water, exhibit rapid growth and is the dominant species cultured in intensive farming systems. However, in such systems, poorly managed culture practices can lead to water pollution (Quyen 2020). Pangasius (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus), a freshwater fish, tolerates low oxygen levels and high-density pond systems, but its reliance on formulated feeds raises environmental concerns (Bosma 2009). Black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon), once a staple species, now plays a smaller role due to its susceptibility to disease, but it remains valuable in integrated mangrove-aquaculture systems where it contributes to biodiversity conservation (Binh 1997). Giant river prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) is often polycultured with rice in rotational farming systems, leveraging natural food sources and reducing input costs. Nevertheless, the efficacy of this model depends on the stringent control of environmental factors such as salinity, temperature, and water quality to ensure the optimal development and productivity of both crops and aquatic animals (Hoa 2017).
Aquaculture practices in Vietnam’s Mekong Delta are highly diverse, ranging from traditional systems like the shrimp-rice model, which prioritizes ecological balance with modest yields, to semi-intensive systems that involve supplementary feeding. Intensive systems, prevalent for species such as pangasius and whiteleg shrimp, achieve high productivity through high stocking densities and formulated feeds, but are often associated with substantial waste generation and high energy consumption (Tu 2021). More recently, super-intensive systems incorporating technologies like biofloc and recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) have gained popularity due to their potential for enhanced productivity and resource efficiency, although they demand higher initial capital investment and greater technical expertise. A thorough understanding of the characteristics and impacts of each system is crucial to the development of a sustainable aquaculture in the region (Hoa 2017).
LCA Methodology: Definitions and Application in Aquaculture
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a methodology systematized in the 1990s and standardized under ISO 14040:2006. It provides a structured approach for evaluating the environmental impacts of a product or system throughout its entire life cycle, from raw material extraction to end-of-life disposal. In aquaculture, LCA quantifies impacts such as greenhouse gas emissions, eutrophication, and resource depletion, offering crucial insights to guide sustainable practices.
LCA can be used in aquaculture, to quantify environmental impacts (e.g. global warming, eutrophication) and identify environmental “hot spots” (key processes or activities that contribute most significantly to the overall environmental impacts). Furthermore, it is widely used to compare production techniques and highlight trade-offs between alternatives, supporting informed decisions for sustainable aquaculture.
The LCA process commences by defining the study’s purpose and scope, such as analyzing the environmental impacts of shrimp aquaculture from hatchery to market, typically using a functional unit of 1 tonne of live product. Subsequently, researchers compile a life cycle inventory, documenting inputs like feed and energy consumption, as well as outputs such as water emissions (i.e. wastewater parameters). The life cycle impact assessment phase then converts these inventoried data (e.g. resource use and emissions) into related environmental impact categories, such as global warming potential, using, for example, ReCiPe, which is a method designed to analyze the impact assessment of an LCA. Finally, the interpretation phase is conducted to identify areas or components of the production model requiring improvement. For instance, feed is typically the largest contributor to the category with the most impact in aquaculture; therefore, reducing feed consumption can lead to better environmental performance.
The strength of LCA lies in its comprehensive scope, enabling the identification of diverse impact categories and critical intervention points, such as inefficient feed utilization in pangasius aquaculture. LCA also facilitates comparisons between systems, supporting certification and policymaking.
LCA Methodology: Current Practices in Southeast Asia
The LCA methodology demands detailed, localized data, which is often lacking in Vietnam, where many small-scale farms maintain incomplete records. Discrepancies in study design, such as varying system boundaries, can further complicate comparisons. Additionally, LCA’s static nature may overlook seasonal variations, such as changes in water quality within the region. These limitations underscore the need for a cautious application.
In Asia, LCA has provided clear insights into the environmental characteristics and impact mechanisms of aquaculture operations. In Thailand, research on black tiger shrimp farming indicated that feed misutilization and pond effluent were primary causes of eutrophication, thereby supporting efforts to achieve the certification of sustainable farming. In Vietnam, pangasius aquaculture studies have revealed that feed accounts for up to 90% of environmental impacts, driving the need for optimized diets with lower fishmeal content. In the Mekong Delta, studies frequently focus on feed waste and pond effluent, which represent the most significant environmental impacts (Huysveld 2013). Another analysis explored resource consumption in intensive systems, highlighting substantial energy demands (Henriksson 2012; Huysveld 2013). The application of LCA in the Mekong Delta reflects a growing awareness of the need to balance productivity with ecosystem health (Henriksson 2012).
LCA Methodology: Social Considerations
Beyond environmental factors, a holistic Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in aquaculture must integrate social considerations, recognizing the deep connection between farming practices and human well-being. A critical focus here is Gender Equality, Disability, and Social Inclusion (GEDSI). This ensures that the benefits and burdens of aquaculture development are distributed fairly across all community members, particularly vulnerable groups. For example, it is crucial to assess the impact of large-scale farms on local livelihoods, labor conditions (including fair wages and safe working environments), and food security for surrounding communities (Tu 2021).
Furthermore, social considerations extend to preserving cultural heritage, traditional farming practices, and indigenous knowledge, which often offer sustainable solutions tailored to local ecological contexts (Binh 1997). The social dimension of LCA can also evaluate how technological advancements, like super-intensive systems, might affect employment displacement or the need for new skills and training, ultimately guiding a just transition towards sustainable aquaculture.
LCA Methodology: Future Prospects
The future of aquaculture in the Mekong Delta hinges on harmonizing productivity with environmental protection, and LCA can serve as a suitable methodology to provide this direction. Innovations in feed, such as the use of plant or microbial-based proteins, promise to reduce reliance on fishmeal, a major impact factor. Integrated systems like the rice-shrimp model offer another avenue, leveraging natural ecosystems to enhance efficiency and biodiversity while reducing input requirements. As climate change induces salinization and flooding, LCA can assess the adoption of technologies such as biofloc systems or mangrove restoration, ensuring both increased production and enhanced resilience.
The evolution of the LCA methodology itself is also crucial. The standardization of methods and the creation of regional databases will improve reliability and comparability, thus addressing current limitations. The incorporation of seasonal and spatial factors, such as water fluctuations in the region, will make LCA more relevant. Beyond research, the integration of LCA results into policy and certification schemes like the Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC) will encourage sustainable practices. Nevertheless, challenges persist. These include securing funding and technical training for local researchers, as well as overcoming the economic barriers to the adoption of new technologies. Collaboration among scientists, farmers, and policymakers will be essential to realize this vision.
Conclusion
The aquaculture sector in the Mekong Delta plays a strategic role in the global food supply chain. However, it faces significant environmental challenges. To address these challenges, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is considered an effective scientific tool, enabling the quantification and identification of environmental impacts from aquaculture activities. Applied LCA studies in Vietnam and Thailand have clearly indicated that feed utilization and wastewater management are key environmental hotspots, necessitating innovative solutions for impact mitigation. This affirms LCA’s potential in guiding aquaculture practices toward sustainability.
In the future, the aquaculture industry in Southeast Asia generally, and the Vietnamese Mekong Delta specifically, holds significant prospects for sustainable development through the adoption of innovations in feed formulations, integrated farming models, and climate change adaptation strategies. To support this process, the LCA methodology needs continued development and customization to suit the specific characteristics and needs of the region. A strong connection between scientific research and practical action will be key for the Mekong Delta to simultaneously maintain its position as an aquaculture hub and conserve its diverse ecosystem.
AQUADAPT 